This was a laborious and
difficult read for me but for different reasons than my previous read. After tackling Volf's technical read, "Work in the
Spirit," I looked at the writing style and the number of pages of Cosden's
book (148 pgs.), and I thought, "I'll get through this one fairly quickly."
Not so. Cosden spends a lot of time "exegeting" finer points of
Scripture so I found myself mulling over much of his interpretive work,
thinking about it, at points coming to a new understanding of "old
texts"; at other times thinking, "I respect what Cosden is saying but
don't agree with him fully." However, despite the "labor"
required (pardon the play on words), my experience was that the book only got
better and better as I went along and "my socks were blown off" by
the time I reached Cosden's final chapters, especially chapter 6, "Shaping
Things to Come: Mission for the Masses.”
Cosden makes the point in chapter
6 (his final chapter) that there is much agreement among various evangelical
leaders today that the "modern missions movement" is in
crisis, “Most evangelical leaders acknowledge that the western mission
enterprise is in trouble and that something is fundamentally wrong with the
‘faith missions movement'” (p. 130).
Cosden gives the example of
missions work he did in Russia twenty years ago, right after communism had
fallen. This illustration hit me pretty hard as in 1992 I was in Hungary (a former
Soviet bloc country that was "liberated" in 1989 with the fall of
communism) doing evangelistic missionary work for a couple months. But Cosden writes that right after communism had fallen, "lives and livelihoods were
crumbling around us as government-based employment welfare systems, ... fell
apart" (p. 128). The most pressing question at that time was, "How
does the gospel relate to life?" Cosden writes that "Our model as
missionaries guaranteed that we produce 'rice Christians'": in other
words, "dependent" Christians who could only hope to be
"delivered" from the futility of their situations rather than find
hope within them. In a word, this theology of missions that said to people in
places like Russia, "trust Jesus and he will save you but has nothing
really to say about your 'ordinary lives / work,' but that maybe He just might liberate
you to becoming a 'missionary' some day" ... was deeply flawed (and continues to be today). Wow. I finish this post
with some Cosden quotes to get us to think more deeply about this "crisis" and the need to re-think how we view work and missions.
“... when done in a way that
images God and thus co-operates with him, human work in itself is
Christian missionary activity. Why? Because it is largely (though not
exclusively) through our work that we reflect God’s image and co-operate with
him in bringing people and the whole creation to humanity’s and nature’s
ultimate maturity and future…. We are saved to become together the image of
Christ, and thus the image of God- and we express and develop this most
directly in our work” (pp. 129-130).
“…this means that any
understanding of mission that fails to grasp that in itself human work
is fundamental to God’s purpose (the mission of God or kingdom of God) for us
and creation will be theologically flawed. Likewise, missions thinking that
fails to incorporate this theology ultimately undermines the missionary calling
of the people of God. For the majority of Christians simply cannot now, nor
could they ever, measure up to the modern faith missionary ideal of leaving
home and work ‘to work’ for God. For what that understanding of mission
unintentionally does is marginalize and thus alienate the vast majority of
Christians in the world who will spend most of their lives and life’s energy in
ordinary work” (p. 130).
“Thus work is not a platform for
mission or evangelism, as if it were somehow subordinate to salvation and
eternity. Rather, godly work itself actually spreads by embodying God’s good
news, a present experience and foretaste of salvation. For work in itself is a
genuine form of life imaging God. It is an ever-open invitation to all to
co-operate with God in his purposes” (p. 135).
2 comments:
Interesting post, Mike. I definitely appreciate efforts like these to help people see their "regular jobs" as kingdom work. Theoretically, the argument seems sound.
But, I do wonder how many people who take this position actually work "regular jobs." I know a lot of people for whom their regular job is very difficult to think of as kingdom work, not so much because they think in terms of a false dichotomy of sacred/secular, but because their daily tasks seem futile, mechanized, and mere instrumentalities of making money for far away executives or entities.
One quote stood out to me: “... when done in a way that images God and thus co-operates with him, human work in itself is Christian missionary activity." This quote seems to allow for a category of work that does not image God and is not done in cooperation with God. Given the materialistic, consumeristic, and arguably nihilistic agenda of our modern economy, is it possible a large number of our "regular jobs" do not image or cooperate with God?
Good thoughts Kenny- you are definitely right about a large number of jobs not "imaging" or cooperating with God.
It's important to remember that Cosden's work is serving as a corrective for a general mindset that has prevailed for a long time among evangelical Christians. I think Volf gets at what you are saying best, actually borrowing from much of the language of Marx, when he spoke of what is "alienating" in work, that to expect "too much" out of work in light of the nature of its fallenness (the Bible uses the language of "toil") would probably need another kind of corrective. And certainly, while part of the problem of alienating work is "attitudinal" (the idea that "we make the best of it"), another large part of it is systemic and structural as well (as Volf would say). What are the oppressive structures that keep our work from having a larger vision for the common good as well as our purpose within that vision? And how do we pray and work for the Kingdom in seeing more just structures so that work can be more intrinsically meaningful for workers, Christian and nonChristian alike?
Post a Comment