But Robinson is
illiberal and unfashionably fierce in her devotion to this Protestant
tradition; she is voluble in defense of silence. She loathes the complacent
idleness whereby contemporary Americans dismiss Puritanism and turn John
Calvin, its great proponent, into an obscure, moralizing bigot: “We are forever
drawing up indictments against the past, then refusing to let it testify in its
own behalf—it is so very guilty, after all. Such attention as we give to it is
usually vindictive and incurious and therefore incompetent.” We flinch from
Puritanism because it placed sin at the center of life, but then, as she tartly
reminds us, “Americans never think of themselves as sharing fully in the human
condition, and therefore beset as all humankind is beset.” Calvin believed in
our “total depravity,” our utter fallenness, but this was not necessarily a
cruel condemnation. “The belief that we are all sinners gives us excellent
grounds for forgiveness and self-forgiveness, and is kindlier than any
expectation that we might be saints, even while it affirms the standards all of
us fail to attain,” Robinson writes in her essay “Puritans and Prigs.”
Nowadays, she argues, educated Americans are prigs, not Puritans, quick to pour
judgment on anyone who fails to toe the right political line. Soft moralizing
has replaced hard moralizing, but at least those old hard moralists admitted to
being moralists. I do not always enjoy Robinson’s ecstasies, but I admire the
obdurateness with which she describes the difficult joys of a faith…. The Homecoming, by James Wood
". . . if we follow the traces of our own actions to their source, they intimate some understanding of the good life." -Matthew B. Crawford, motorcycle mechanic and academic
Monday, October 24, 2011
Americans as Soft Moralists and Prigs
I'm reading through Marilynne Robinson's Home written about the fictional character of Presbyterian pastor Robert Boughton and the return of his "prodigal son" of twenty years, Jack. This is Robinson's third novel after penning the pulitzer-prize winner Gilead back in 2004. Without having a lot to say at this point about either book, other than they are engaging and beautifully-written, nonetheless, I came across a New Yorker article written by James Wood. Wood doesn't seem to be particularly friendly to Christians, especially evangelical Christians, but he seems to have a positive regard for Robinson (who would likely refer to herself as a "liberal" or "mainline" Christian), particularly some of her thoughts about Americans in their rejection of "sin," Calvin and the Puritans, being what she calls "soft moralists" and "prigs":
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment