Nuance
regarding jobs and calling grew as we entered an industrial and information age
and much of society veered away from an agrarian society. As Placher writes:
Jobs can seem not only meaningless but actually destructive of our lives
as Christians. Store clerks and computer programmers miss church because they
have to work Sundays.... on average people work longer hours than they did a
generation ago, and a long commute often adds to the length of the working day,
with less time to spend with spouses and children, less time to be an active
church member or an active community citizen. Corporate careers regularly
involve multiple moves... parents and grandparents get left behind, to be
visited only on rare occasions. In such a context, to urge people to think of
their job as the call from God that gives their life meaning may be to push
them in exactly the wrong direction, toward centering their lives ever more on
jobs that already obsess them. Callings, p. 327
Certain
Christian writers like Jacques Ellul reacted to the Reformation idea of every
job being a vocation, i.e. call from God. Ellul made the case for the Bible
always speaking of a summons or special invitation to a particular task when
using the language of calling. Work is necessary for survival but not as a
“superfluous spiritual decoration” (p. 328). Our jobs do not give our lives
meaning and the Bible never claims they do, so believed Ellul. American Baptist
James Holloway wrote that we don’t know what the prophets and apostles did to
earn a living because this wasn’t important to their calling from God; work is
not a vocation (p. 328). Stanley Hauwerwas cautions us against making more of
work than we should, that work is nothing more than “the means to survive, to
be of service to others, and perhaps most of all, … gives us a way to stay
busy” (p. 328). Even Miroslav Volf believed that the term “vocation” should be
lifted from the Christian idea of work.
So
much being written in recent years against the notion of “job as vocation,”
Placher pushes back some by seeing there to be high value in many kinds of work
but also that vocation can mean a lot of things for a lot of people. Early on
priesthood and monastic life comprised an individual sense of call. At other
times, like the ones in which we live, Christians have felt “called” to secular
jobs or possibly to family life. As Placher writes, “We do not have to limit
‘vocation’ or ‘calling’ to one meaning and then vote it, in that sense, up or
down” (p. 330). Job as vocation should stay on the list, but not as the only
option. At the end of the day humans want to know, does my life have meaning
and purpose?
For some of us, the center of the answer may lie in
our jobs- from doctors curing patients to landscapers making the spaces in
which people live a bit more beautiful. For others, our jobs will be meaningful
primarily only in that they help us support our families, and it will be in the
nurturing of a family that we find the core of our life’s vocation. For still
others, a hobby may create a community and reward not found in a paid job.
Still others may find the activities of their church the work that most gives
meaning to their lives. Even on the job, some people may find the support and
friendship they give their co-workers more significance than the doing of the
job itself. Indeed, in an age when once again committed Christians in Europe
and North America may find themselves a minority voice in their society, simply
being publicly a Christian, as in the early church, may itself be an important
calling…. These are not, moreover, brand new issues…. What should I do with my
life? How can I know? Will I find something that gives my life a sense of
purpose or meaning? Even through the context in which we ask such questions has
grown ever more complex, the Christian tradition still provides us with a range
of resources for thinking about how to answer them. Callings, pp.
330-32
No comments:
Post a Comment